Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-10970 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANTONIO VALENCIANO-ESPINOZA Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-33-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-10970 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANTONIO VALENCIANO-ESPINOZA Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-33-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal C..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 18, 2009
No. 08-10970
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE ANTONIO VALENCIANO-ESPINOZA
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:08-CR-33-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Antonio Valenciano-
Espinoza presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States
v. Brown,
920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by
United States v. Candia,
454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that
a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-10970
unimposed state sentence. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2