Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Johnson, 08-11040 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-11040 Visitors: 39
Filed: Sep. 29, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2009 No. 08-11040 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-113-6 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Leon Johnso
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                        September 29, 2009
                                     No. 08-11040
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:05-CR-113-6


Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Leon Johnson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Johnson has not filed a timely response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is
GRANTED, counsel’s supplemental motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 08-11040

unnecessary, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer