Filed: Dec. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2009 No. 08-20735 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAKEBA DEHRON THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-330-7 Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Makeba Dehron T
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2009 No. 08-20735 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAKEBA DEHRON THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-330-7 Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Makeba Dehron Th..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 15, 2009
No. 08-20735
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MAKEBA DEHRON THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-330-7
Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Makeba Dehron Thomas has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.