Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bradford, 08-30505 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-30505 Visitors: 30
Filed: Sep. 22, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 22, 2009 No. 08-30505 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHNNVEZ DEMON BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-30036-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Johnnvez D
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                        September 22, 2009
                                     No. 08-30505
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHNNVEZ DEMON BRADFORD,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 3:07-CR-30036-1


Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Johnnvez Demon Bradford has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).           Bradford has not filed a response.             Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer