Filed: Sep. 22, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 22, 2009 No. 08-30505 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHNNVEZ DEMON BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-30036-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Johnnvez D
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 22, 2009 No. 08-30505 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHNNVEZ DEMON BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-30036-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Johnnvez De..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 22, 2009
No. 08-30505
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOHNNVEZ DEMON BRADFORD,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:07-CR-30036-1
Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Johnnvez Demon Bradford has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bradford has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.