Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cryer v. United States, 08-30667 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-30667 Visitors: 80
Filed: Feb. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 4, 2009 No. 08-30667 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk TOMMY K. CRYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 5:07-CV-2206 Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Tommy Cryer sued the government, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7431,
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 4, 2009
                                     No. 08-30667
                                   Summary Calendar                   Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                              Clerk




TOMMY K. CRYER,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Defendant-Appellee.




                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                                No. 5:07-CV-2206




Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*


       Tommy Cryer sued the government, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7431, for al-
leged wrongful disclosures of tax return information in violation of 
id. § 6103.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                  No. 08-30667

The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss for failure to state
a claim, mainly on the ground that the information allegedly disclosed is not “re-
turn information” as intended by the statute.
      The district court explained its reasons in a careful “Memorandum Ruling”
entered on May 13, 2008. We agree with the analysis in that opinion. The judg-
ment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer