Filed: Jun. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40652 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. HAROLD EARL SCALLON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-19-ALL Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Harold Earl Scallon
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40652 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. HAROLD EARL SCALLON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-19-ALL Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Harold Earl Scallon h..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 16, 2009
No. 08-40652
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HAROLD EARL SCALLON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:08-CR-19-ALL
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Harold Earl Scallon has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Scallon has filed a response. Our independent review of
the record, counsel’s brief, and Scallon’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.