Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 23, 2009 No. 08-40978 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk AUSTIN L CURTIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICHEAL CHERTOFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 4:07-CV-307 Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Austin L. Curtis appeal
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 23, 2009 No. 08-40978 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk AUSTIN L CURTIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICHEAL CHERTOFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 4:07-CV-307 Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Austin L. Curtis appeals..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 23, 2009
No. 08-40978 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Summary Calendar Clerk
AUSTIN L CURTIS
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MICHEAL CHERTOFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
4:07-CV-307
Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Austin L. Curtis appeals the dismissal of his various employment-
discrimination claims on summary judgment. We review a grant of summary
judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court. Robinson
v. Orient Marine Co. Ltd.,
505 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 2007). For the reasons set
forth by the district court, Curtis failed to meet his responsive burden on
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-40978
summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2