Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ortiz, 08-41161 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-41161 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2009 No. 08-41161 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS ORTIZ, also known as Pelon, also known as Jose Ortiz, also known as Raymundo Garcia Garcia, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-246-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMEN
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           August 18, 2009
                                     No. 08-41161
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS ORTIZ, also known as Pelon, also known as Jose Ortiz, also known
as Raymundo Garcia Garcia,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:07-CR-246-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Jose Luis Ortiz has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ortiz has filed a response. Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Ortiz’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer