Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Price, 08-50750 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-50750 Visitors: 49
Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-50750 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CLARENCE PRICE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-176-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Clarence Pri
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          February 18, 2009
                                     No. 08-50750
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

CLARENCE PRICE

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:06-CR-176-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Clarence Price presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 
85 F.3d 240
, 242-44 (5th Cir. 1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the
felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States
v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). The Government’s motion for
summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer