Filed: Dec. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 30, 2009 No. 08-50894 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH W. GARDINER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-1417-ALL Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Joseph W. Gardiner
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 30, 2009 No. 08-50894 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH W. GARDINER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-1417-ALL Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Joseph W. Gardiner h..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 30, 2009
No. 08-50894
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSEPH W. GARDINER,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CR-1417-ALL
Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Joseph W. Gardiner has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gardiner has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.