Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gardiner, 08-50894 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-50894 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 30, 2009 No. 08-50894 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH W. GARDINER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-1417-ALL Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Joseph W. Gardiner
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                        December 30, 2009
                                     No. 08-50894
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH W. GARDINER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                          USDC No. 3:08-CR-1417-ALL


Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Joseph W. Gardiner has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Gardiner has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

       *
        Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer