Filed: Oct. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2009 No. 09-20289 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk KLEINWOOD MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CYPRESS FOREST PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT; JP/RAVENEAUX PARTNERS LP; KERA DEVELOPMENT L.P., Defendants, Appellees. Appeal From the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Lower Docket Number 4:08-CV-3071 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and E
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2009 No. 09-20289 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk KLEINWOOD MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CYPRESS FOREST PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT; JP/RAVENEAUX PARTNERS LP; KERA DEVELOPMENT L.P., Defendants, Appellees. Appeal From the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Lower Docket Number 4:08-CV-3071 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and EL..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 5, 2009
No. 09-20289 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Summary Calendar Clerk
KLEINWOOD MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
CYPRESS FOREST PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT; JP/RAVENEAUX
PARTNERS LP; KERA DEVELOPMENT L.P.,
Defendants, Appellees.
Appeal From the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Lower Docket Number 4:08-CV-3071
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Before us in this appeal is the district court’s dismissal pursuant to
F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) of Kleinwood’s constitutional claims advanced under 42 U.S.C.
§1983 and other federal and state claims. Having reviewed the district court’s
Order of March 30, 2009, the briefs of the parties, and the record on appeal, we
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 09-20005
are satisfied that, for the reasons set forth by the district court, its judgment
should be and is hereby
AFFIRMED.
2