Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lozano, 09-50065 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-50065 Visitors: 42
Filed: Oct. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2009 No. 09-50065 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALVADOR ISRAEL LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 3:08-CR-2247-2 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The appointed attorney for Salvador Lozano has moved fo
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           October 5, 2009
                                     No. 09-50065
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SALVADOR ISRAEL LOZANO,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                               No. 3:08-CR-2247-2


Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The appointed attorney for Salvador Lozano has moved for leave to with-
draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Lozano has filed a response. Our review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Lozano’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi-
bilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer