Filed: Oct. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2009 No. 09-50065 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALVADOR ISRAEL LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 3:08-CR-2247-2 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The appointed attorney for Salvador Lozano has moved fo
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2009 No. 09-50065 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALVADOR ISRAEL LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 3:08-CR-2247-2 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The appointed attorney for Salvador Lozano has moved for..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 5, 2009
No. 09-50065
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SALVADOR ISRAEL LOZANO,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
No. 3:08-CR-2247-2
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The appointed attorney for Salvador Lozano has moved for leave to with-
draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Lozano has filed a response. Our review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Lozano’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi-
bilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.