Filed: Sep. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 2, 2009 No. 09-50113 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE GORGONIO RIVERA-CORRAL Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-2937-ALL Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Gorgonio Rivera-Corral appeals from his
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 2, 2009 No. 09-50113 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE GORGONIO RIVERA-CORRAL Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-2937-ALL Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Gorgonio Rivera-Corral appeals from his ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 2, 2009
No. 09-50113
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE GORGONIO RIVERA-CORRAL
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CR-2937-ALL
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Gorgonio Rivera-Corral appeals from his conviction of attempted
illegal reentry, for which he was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment.
Rivera-Corral contends solely that his sentence was unreasonable because the
district court failed to take into account certain factors when determining the
sentence.
Rivera-Corral has not shown any procedural error by the district court
when determining his sentence. See Gall v. United States,
128 S. Ct. 586, 597
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 09-50113
(2007). Nor has he rebutted the presumption of reasonableness given to his
sentence within the appropriate guideline sentencing range. See United States
v. Alonzo,
435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.
2