Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-50289 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LACHARLES WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-427-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lacharle
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-50289 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LACHARLES WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-427-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lacharles..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 20, 2009
No. 09-50289
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LACHARLES WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:08-CR-427-1
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lacharles Williams presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. DeLeon,
170
F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999) (rejecting Commerce Clause challenge to felon-in-
possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)); United States v. Rawls,
85
F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (same). The Government’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.