Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. LaCharles Williams, 09-50289 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-50289 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-50289 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LACHARLES WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-427-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lacharle
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          October 20, 2009
                                     No. 09-50289
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

LACHARLES WILLIAMS,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:08-CR-427-1


Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Lacharles Williams presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. DeLeon, 
170 F.3d 494
, 499 (5th Cir. 1999) (rejecting Commerce Clause challenge to felon-in-
possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)); United States v. Rawls, 
85 F.3d 240
, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (same). The Government’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer