Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Medrano-Bonilla, 08-10965 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-10965 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-10965 Document: 00511150629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 08-10965 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO MEDRANO-BONILLA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-121-ALL Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
More
     Case: 08-10965     Document: 00511150629          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/22/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 22, 2010
                                     No. 08-10965
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO MEDRANO-BONILLA,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:08-CR-121-ALL


Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Medrano-
Bonilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Medrano-Bonilla has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer