Filed: May 07, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-30978 Document: 00511104420 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 7, 2010 No. 08-30978 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SCOTTRELL MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:00-CR-50050-10 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 08-30978 Document: 00511104420 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 7, 2010 No. 08-30978 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SCOTTRELL MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:00-CR-50050-10 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 08-30978 Document: 00511104420 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 7, 2010
No. 08-30978
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SCOTTRELL MORRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 5:00-CR-50050-10
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Scottrell Morris has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Morris has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Morris’s response discloses no nonfrivo-
lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.