Filed: Jun. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2010 No. 08-60586 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BARRINGTON BERTON MORGAN-WHITE Petitioner v. ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A90 395 622 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion 12/15/09, 5 Cir., _, _, F.3d _) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2010 No. 08-60586 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BARRINGTON BERTON MORGAN-WHITE Petitioner v. ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A90 395 622 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion 12/15/09, 5 Cir., _, _, F.3d _) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 23, 2010
No. 08-60586
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
BARRINGTON BERTON MORGAN-WHITE
Petitioner
v.
ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A90 395 622
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 12/15/09, 5 Cir., __________, ___________, F.3d ___________)
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel
Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED.
Morgan-White petitioned this court for review of the decision of the Board
of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-60586
judge’s order that Morgan-White is ineligible for cancellation of removal
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a) because he committed an aggravated felony.
This court affirmed the Board’s decision, finding Morgan-White’s appeal
foreclosed by our decision in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder.1 The Supreme Court
has since reversed that decision, rejecting this court’s “hypothetical approach”
and holding that “the defendant must . . . have been actually convicted of a crime
that is itself punishable as a felony under federal law.”2 As in Carachuri-
Rosendo, Morgan-White was not actually convicted under the state recidivist
statute. In accordance with the Supreme Court’s ruling, we now REVERSE and
REMAND. The outstanding motion is moot.
1
570 F.3d 263 (5th Cir. 2009).
2
Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, No. 09-60 (U.S., June 14, 2010).
2