Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-11122 Document: 00511150156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11122 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME GEORGE LUNA, also known as Jaime Luna, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-67-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circui
Summary: Case: 09-11122 Document: 00511150156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11122 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME GEORGE LUNA, also known as Jaime Luna, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-67-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit..
More
Case: 09-11122 Document: 00511150156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-11122
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JAIME GEORGE LUNA, also known as Jaime Luna,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CR-67-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jaime George Luna has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Luna has filed a response. Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Luna’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.