Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-11137 Document: 00511150078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11137 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PETER M. ESPINOSA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-80-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* App
Summary: Case: 09-11137 Document: 00511150078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-11137 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PETER M. ESPINOSA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-80-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appe..
More
Case: 09-11137 Document: 00511150078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-11137
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PETER M. ESPINOSA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CR-80-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Peter M. Espinosa presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed as this court has repeatedly held that
a sentencing judge may find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts
necessary to the determination of a sentencing guidelines range. See, e.g.,
United States v. Rhine,
583 F.3d 878, 891 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v.
Stevens,
487 F.3d 232, 245-46 (5th Cir. 2007); United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 09-11137 Document: 00511150078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
No. 09-11137
793, 798 (5th Cir. 2006). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2