Filed: May 25, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-30507 Document: 00511119474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/24/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 24, 2010 No. 09-30507 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LOVELESS BELL, also known as Loveless Milson, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:07-CR-20052-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and GARZA
Summary: Case: 09-30507 Document: 00511119474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/24/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 24, 2010 No. 09-30507 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LOVELESS BELL, also known as Loveless Milson, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:07-CR-20052-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and GARZA ..
More
Case: 09-30507 Document: 00511119474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/24/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 24, 2010
No. 09-30507
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LOVELESS BELL, also known as Loveless Milson,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:07-CR-20052-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Loveless Bell has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Bell has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record
and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.