Filed: Aug. 12, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-30854 Document: 00511202389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 12, 2010 No. 09-30854 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL VESPA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:09-CR-6-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The
Summary: Case: 09-30854 Document: 00511202389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 12, 2010 No. 09-30854 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL VESPA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:09-CR-6-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The a..
More
Case: 09-30854 Document: 00511202389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 12, 2010
No. 09-30854
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MICHAEL VESPA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:09-CR-6-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Michael Vespa has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Vespa has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.