Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Pedro Perez-Mendoza, 09-40356 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-40356 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40356 Document: 00511085742 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40356 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO PEREZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-493-4 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
More
     Case: 09-40356     Document: 00511085742          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2010
                                     No. 09-40356
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO PEREZ-MENDOZA,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:07-CR-493-4


Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Perez-Mendoza has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Perez-Mendoza has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer