Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40656 Document: 00511149221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-40656 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HECTOR SALAZAR-ANZALDUA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-97-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
Summary: Case: 09-40656 Document: 00511149221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-40656 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HECTOR SALAZAR-ANZALDUA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-97-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:..
More
Case: 09-40656 Document: 00511149221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-40656
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HECTOR SALAZAR-ANZALDUA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:09-CR-97-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Salazar-
Anzaldua has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salazar-Anzaldua has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.