Filed: Sep. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41150 Document: 00511241006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 22, 2010 No. 09-41150 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE ALBERTO ESQUIVEL-MEXIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-1440-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 09-41150 Document: 00511241006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 22, 2010 No. 09-41150 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE ALBERTO ESQUIVEL-MEXIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-1440-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. ..
More
Case: 09-41150 Document: 00511241006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 22, 2010
No. 09-41150
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JORGE ALBERTO ESQUIVEL-MEXIA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:09-CR-1440-1
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Alberto
Esquivel-Mexia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Esquivel-Mexia has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.