Filed: Aug. 17, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41213 Document: 00511205664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 17, 2010 No. 09-41213 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODOLFO FUENTES-MIRANDA, also known as Rodolfo Miranda-Fuentes, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-350-1 Before DAVIS, SMI
Summary: Case: 09-41213 Document: 00511205664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 17, 2010 No. 09-41213 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODOLFO FUENTES-MIRANDA, also known as Rodolfo Miranda-Fuentes, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-350-1 Before DAVIS, SMIT..
More
Case: 09-41213 Document: 00511205664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 17, 2010
No. 09-41213
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RODOLFO FUENTES-MIRANDA, also known as Rodolfo Miranda-Fuentes,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CR-350-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Fuentes-
Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Fuentes-Miranda has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.