Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41272 Document: 00511150178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-41272 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN,
Summary: Case: 09-41272 Document: 00511150178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2010 No. 09-41272 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1 Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, ..
More
Case: 09-41272 Document: 00511150178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 22, 2010
No. 09-41272
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Hinojosa presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Daugherty,
264
F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. De Leon,
170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999)
(same); United States v. Rawls,
85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (same). The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.