Filed: Aug. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-50539 Document: 00511210882 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2010 No. 09-50539 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ELVIN WINSTON RICKS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-192-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 09-50539 Document: 00511210882 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2010 No. 09-50539 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ELVIN WINSTON RICKS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-192-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 09-50539 Document: 00511210882 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2010
No. 09-50539
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ELVIN WINSTON RICKS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:08-CR-192-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Elvin Winston Ricks has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ricks has filed a response and motion to strike the Anders
brief. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ricks’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Ricks’s motion
to strike the Anders brief is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.