Case: 09-60339     Document: 00511117545          Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/20/2010




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                  FILED
                                                                            May 20, 2010
                                     No. 09-60339
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

GENARO SALAZAR,

                                                   Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                   Respondent


                        Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                BIA No. A079 011 977


Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        Genaro Salazar petitions this court for review of an order from the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)
decision granting the respondent’s motion to pretermit Salazar’s request to
adjust his status and determining that Salazar was ineligible for a waiver of
inadmissibility.      The BIA found that Salazar was statutorily ineligible for
adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255 because he was inadmissible
under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) as a result of his prior conviction for smuggling

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 09-60339    Document: 00511117545 Page: 2         Date Filed: 05/20/2010
                                 No. 09-60339

aliens. The BIA further determined that Salazar was statutorily ineligible for
an 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) waiver because he was found inadmissible under
§ 1182(a)(6) rather than § 1182(a)(2) as required for a § 1182(h) waiver.
      When considering a petition for review, this court reviews the BIA’s legal
decisions de novo, although this court defers to reasonable interpretations of
agency regulations. Hernandez-Castillo v. Moore, 

, 519 (5th Cir.
2006).
      Under § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i), any alien who “knowingly has encouraged,
induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the
United States in violation of law is inadmissible.” Thus, the IJ’s finding that
Salazar was an alien smuggler made him inadmissible and therefore ineligible
for adjustment of status under § 1255. See Soriano v. Gonzales, 

,
321 (5th Cir. 2007).      Salazar argues that he is not inadmissible under
§ 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) based on the BIA’s unpublished decision in In re Popoca, No.
A90 751 142, 

(BIA Feb. 9, 2006). Popoca is inapplicable here,
and, as such, the BIA properly affirmed the IJ’s decision.
      Salazar also appears to argue that he is entitled to a § 1182(h) waiver
because that section violates his constitutional rights. His argument is without
merit.   That is, Salazar cannot and has not overcome the fact that he is
statutorily ineligible for a § 1182(h) waiver because he was found inadmissible
under § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) instead of § 1182(a)(2), regardless of any alleged
constitutional infirmities in § 1182(h). Accordingly, Salazar’s petition for review
is DENIED.




                                         2