Filed: Dec. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-10469 Document: 00511314885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 10-10469 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MARIO LEMUS, Petitioner-Appellant v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; BUREAU OF CUSTOMS & IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dist
Summary: Case: 10-10469 Document: 00511314885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 10-10469 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MARIO LEMUS, Petitioner-Appellant v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; BUREAU OF CUSTOMS & IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Distr..
More
Case: 10-10469 Document: 00511314885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 8, 2010
No. 10-10469
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
MARIO LEMUS,
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY; BUREAU OF CUSTOMS & IMMIGRATION
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,
Respondents-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:09-CV-209
Before GARWOOD, PRADO and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mario Lemus, formerly federal prisoner # 56398-019, appeals from the
denial of relief in his action, filed in September 2009, seeking recognition that
he is an American citizen so that he could have access to prison programs that
allow for early release or halfway house placement. He sought transfer to a
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 10-10469 Document: 00511314885 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
No. 10-10469
facility where he could avail himself of such programs. He also sought removal
of an immigration detainer against him.
“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,
if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Lemus’s July
2010 release rendered moot his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 claims. See Rocky v. King,
900
F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990). Lemus’s claim regarding the removal of the
immigration detainer, whether brought under section 2241 or any other
provision of law, was rendered moot by his September 2010 removal to Mexico.
See
id.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
2