Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Christopher Kingsley, 10-30312 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-30312 Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 11, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-30312 Document: 00511291137 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 11, 2010 No. 10-30312 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER KINGSLEY, also known as Keg, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:97-CR-50079-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, C
More
     Case: 10-30312 Document: 00511291137 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                         November 11, 2010
                                     No. 10-30312
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER KINGSLEY, also known as Keg,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Louisiana
                            USDC No. 5:97-CR-50079-1


Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Kingsley
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Kingsley has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer