Filed: Nov. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-40372 Document: 00511301651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 22, 2010 No. 10-40372 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN MANUEL RUIZ-DEL VALLE, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-936-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 10-40372 Document: 00511301651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 22, 2010 No. 10-40372 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN MANUEL RUIZ-DEL VALLE, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-936-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER ..
More
Case: 10-40372 Document: 00511301651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 22, 2010
No. 10-40372
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN MANUEL RUIZ-DEL VALLE,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:09-CR-936-1
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel Ruiz-
Del Valle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ruiz-Del Valle has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.