Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Job Ceron-Hernandez, 09-11207 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-11207 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 14, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-11207 Document: 00511409277 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 14, 2011 No. 09-11207 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOB ISMAEL CERON-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-231-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER C
More
     Case: 09-11207 Document: 00511409277 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           March 14, 2011
                                     No. 09-11207
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOB ISMAEL CERON-HERNANDEZ,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:08-CR-231-1


Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Job Ismael Ceron-Hernandez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ceron-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer