Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lorenzo Hunter, 10-10485 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-10485 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-10485 Document: 00511408014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 11, 2011 No. 10-10485 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LORENZO LADELL HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-146-1 Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
More
     Case: 10-10485 Document: 00511408014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           March 11, 2011
                                     No. 10-10485
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LORENZO LADELL HUNTER,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:08-CR-146-1


Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Ladell
Hunter has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Hunter has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer