Filed: Dec. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-20728 Document: 00511699027 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 10-20728 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE PEDRO SANCHEZ-LUNAR, also known as Jose Pedro Sanchez, also known as Joe Pedro Sanchez, also known as Pedro Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Souther
Summary: Case: 10-20728 Document: 00511699027 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 10-20728 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE PEDRO SANCHEZ-LUNAR, also known as Jose Pedro Sanchez, also known as Joe Pedro Sanchez, also known as Pedro Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern..
More
Case: 10-20728 Document: 00511699027 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 19, 2011
No. 10-20728
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE PEDRO SANCHEZ-LUNAR, also known as Jose Pedro Sanchez, also
known as Joe Pedro Sanchez, also known as Pedro Sanchez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:08-CR-119-1
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Pedro Sanchez-Lunar (Sanchez)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 10-20728 Document: 00511699027 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
No. 10-20728
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2