Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Stewart, 10-40743 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-40743 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 12, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-40743 Document: 00511475844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2011 No. 10-40743 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMES RUSTIN STEWART, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-159-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
More
     Case: 10-40743 Document: 00511475844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            May 12, 2011
                                     No. 10-40743
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES RUSTIN STEWART,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 1:09-CR-159-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Rustin Stewart
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Stewart has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.                 We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer