Filed: May 12, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-40743 Document: 00511475844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2011 No. 10-40743 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMES RUSTIN STEWART, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-159-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 10-40743 Document: 00511475844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2011 No. 10-40743 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMES RUSTIN STEWART, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-159-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:*..
More
Case: 10-40743 Document: 00511475844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 12, 2011
No. 10-40743
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JAMES RUSTIN STEWART,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:09-CR-159-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Rustin Stewart
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Stewart has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.