Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Smart v. United States, 10-51012 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-51012 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-51012 Document: 00511400201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 3, 2011 No. 10-51012 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk MICHAEL C. SMART Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso USDC No. 3:10-00132 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.. PER CURIAM:*
More
Case: 10-51012 Document: 00511400201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 3, 2011 No. 10-51012 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk MICHAEL C. SMART Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso USDC No. 3:10-00132 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.. PER CURIAM:* Michael Smart has filed a series of pro se lawsuits against federal agencies, officers, and employees. The instant appeal is from the dismissal of his cause of action based upon res judicata. Smart asserts general conclusions with very little detail and makes no references to the record. It is clear, however, that the nucleus of this suit is the same as the previous case that was dismissed by a district court in our circuit and affirmed by this Court on appeal. The district * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-51012 Document: 00511400201 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2011 No. 10-51012 court correctly determined that res judicata applied and dismissed the claim herein. This appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer