Filed: Sep. 30, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10037 Document: 00511618894 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 30, 2011 No. 11-10037 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH ENOX, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-143-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 11-10037 Document: 00511618894 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 30, 2011 No. 11-10037 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH ENOX, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-143-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T..
More
Case: 11-10037 Document: 00511618894 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 30, 2011
No. 11-10037
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSEPH ENOX,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:10-CR-143-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Enox has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Enox has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10037 Document: 00511618894 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2011
No. 11-10037
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2