Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Chadwick Heath, 11-10093 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-10093 Visitors: 66
Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-10093 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHADWICK DARAY HEATH, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
More
     Case: 11-10093     Document: 00511640060         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/21/2011




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 21, 2011
                                     No. 11-10093
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHADWICK DARAY HEATH,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3


Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Chadwick Daray Heath has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Heath has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-10093   Document: 00511640060   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/21/2011

                              No. 11-10093

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer