Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10146 Document: 00511640086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-10146 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS ERNESTO PEYREFITTE-TORO, also known as Pedro Salas-Coronado, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-51-1 Before BENAVID
Summary: Case: 11-10146 Document: 00511640086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-10146 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS ERNESTO PEYREFITTE-TORO, also known as Pedro Salas-Coronado, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-51-1 Before BENAVIDE..
More
Case: 11-10146 Document: 00511640086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-10146
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JESUS ERNESTO PEYREFITTE-TORO, also known as Pedro Salas-Coronado,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:10-CR-51-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Ernesto
Peyrefitte-Toro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peyrefitte-Toro has filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein, as well as Peyrefitte-Toro’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10146 Document: 00511640086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-10146
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2