Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-40283 Document: 00511640595 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40283 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEBASTIAN LLAMAS-COLLAZO, also known as Aniceto Gallardo Carrada, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-1123-1 Before BENAVI
Summary: Case: 11-40283 Document: 00511640595 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40283 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEBASTIAN LLAMAS-COLLAZO, also known as Aniceto Gallardo Carrada, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-1123-1 Before BENAVID..
More
Case: 11-40283 Document: 00511640595 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-40283
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SEBASTIAN LLAMAS-COLLAZO, also known as Aniceto Gallardo Carrada,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:10-CR-1123-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Sebastian Llamas-Collazo has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Llamas-Collazo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.