Filed: Dec. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-40336 c/w No. 11-40339 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS VILLASANA-LUEVANOS, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-1257-1 USDC No. 1:07-CR-1203-1 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-40336 c/w No. 11-40339 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS VILLASANA-LUEVANOS, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-1257-1 USDC No. 1:07-CR-1203-1 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal P..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 19, 2011
No. 11-40336
c/w No. 11-40339 Lyle W. Cayce
Conference Calendar Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE LUIS VILLASANA-LUEVANOS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:10-CR-1257-1
USDC No. 1:07-CR-1203-1
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Villasana-
Luevanos (Villasana) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villasana has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-40336
c/w No. 11-40339
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the consolidated appeals
present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2