Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40502 c/w No. 11-40522 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DONACIANO RODRIGUEZ-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-1123-1 USDC No. 1:10-CR-1369-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fed
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40502 c/w No. 11-40522 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DONACIANO RODRIGUEZ-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-1123-1 USDC No. 1:10-CR-1369-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fede..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-40502
c/w No. 11-40522 Lyle W. Cayce
Conference Calendar Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DONACIANO RODRIGUEZ-MENDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:08-CR-1123-1
USDC No. 1:10-CR-1369-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donaciano Rodriguez-
Mendez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Mendez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-40502
c/w No. 11-40522
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2