THOMPSON v. CONNICK, 641 F.3d 133 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: infco20110513086
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 13, 2011
Latest Update: May 13, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM: This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1350 , 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011). Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Appellants. FootNotes * Judge Dennis and Judge Graves did n
Summary: PER CURIAM: This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1350 , 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011). Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Appellants. FootNotes * Judge Dennis and Judge Graves did no..
More
PER CURIAM:
This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011).
Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Appellants.
FootNotes
* Judge Dennis and Judge Graves did not participate in this decision.
Source: Leagle
