Filed: Jan. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10316 Document: 00511724674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2012 No. 11-10316 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee v. CEDRIC ROBINSON, also known as C.C., Defendant–Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-206-8 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judg
Summary: Case: 11-10316 Document: 00511724674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 13, 2012 No. 11-10316 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee v. CEDRIC ROBINSON, also known as C.C., Defendant–Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-206-8 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judge..
More
Case: 11-10316 Document: 00511724674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 13, 2012
No. 11-10316
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee
v.
CEDRIC ROBINSON, also known as C.C.,
Defendant–Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:10-CR-206-8
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Cedric Robinson has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Robinson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10316 Document: 00511724674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2012
No. 11-10316
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2