Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 11-10668 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THOMAS GARCIA, JR., Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-63-2 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
Summary: Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 11-10668 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THOMAS GARCIA, JR., Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-63-2 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:..
More
Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 21, 2012
No. 11-10668
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
THOMAS GARCIA, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:10-CR-63-2
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Garcia, Jr., has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-10668
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2