Filed: Sep. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-10772 Document: 00511979052 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 7, 2012 No. 11-10772 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JEFF PAUL, MARGARET PAUL, JIM FLECK, AMY FLECK, PPS ADVERTISING, INC., INTERNATIONAL PROFIT SYSTEMS, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY, formerly known as AMER US LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN
Summary: Case: 11-10772 Document: 00511979052 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 7, 2012 No. 11-10772 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JEFF PAUL, MARGARET PAUL, JIM FLECK, AMY FLECK, PPS ADVERTISING, INC., INTERNATIONAL PROFIT SYSTEMS, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY, formerly known as AMER US LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY..
More
Case: 11-10772 Document: 00511979052 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 7, 2012 No. 11-10772 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JEFF PAUL, MARGARET PAUL, JIM FLECK, AMY FLECK, PPS ADVERTISING, INC., INTERNATIONAL PROFIT SYSTEMS, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY, formerly known as AMER US LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly known as AVIVA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly known as INDIANAPOLIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CV-1490 Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record, studying the briefs, and listening to oral arguments, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court for essentially the * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-10772 Document: 00511979052 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 No. 11-10772 same reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order of July 12, 2011. AFFIRMED. 2
