Filed: Apr. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-20312 Document: 00511824315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 17, 2012 No. 11-20312 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDGAR IVAN GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-534-6 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judg
Summary: Case: 11-20312 Document: 00511824315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 17, 2012 No. 11-20312 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDGAR IVAN GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-534-6 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judge..
More
Case: 11-20312 Document: 00511824315 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 17, 2012
No. 11-20312
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDGAR IVAN GUERRERO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CR-534-6
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Edgar Ivan Guerrero has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Guerrero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-20312 Document: 00511824315 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
No. 11-20312
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2