Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shannon Dardar v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Et, 11-30571 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-30571 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-30571 Document: 00511721272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 11, 2012 No. 11-30571 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk SHANNON A. DARDAR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-1589 Before JONES, Chief
More
     Case: 11-30571    Document: 00511721272         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/11/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                        January 11, 2012

                                    No. 11-30571                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                  Summary Calendar                            Clerk



SHANNON A. DARDAR,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellant
v.

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
TRUST COMPANY,

                                                 Defendants-Appellees



                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 2:10-CV-1589


Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        This appeal before us concerns tolling of prescriptive periods during
bankruptcy proceedings and res judicata. We have carefully reviewed the briefs
and the pertinent parts of the record and finding no reversible error of fact or
law, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the trial court. Moreover, the




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-30571    Document: 00511721272    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/11/2012




                                No. 11-30571

claims for TILA violations and negligent misrepresentation are prescribed under
Louisiana Law and 11 U.S.C. ยง 108.
                                                                 AFFIRMED




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer