Filed: Feb. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-50523 Document: 00511765152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 23, 2012 No. 11-50523 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SYLVIA ESPINOZA ESCOVEDO, also known as China, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-319-6 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Ci
Summary: Case: 11-50523 Document: 00511765152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 23, 2012 No. 11-50523 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SYLVIA ESPINOZA ESCOVEDO, also known as China, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-319-6 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Cir..
More
Case: 11-50523 Document: 00511765152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 23, 2012
No. 11-50523
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SYLVIA ESPINOZA ESCOVEDO, also known as China,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:10-CR-319-6
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Sylvia Espinoza Escovedo has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Escovedo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-50523 Document: 00511765152 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2012
No. 11-50523
The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment
should be corrected to reflect that Escovedo is ordered to pay a special
assessment of $100.00 rather than $100,00. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction
of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.
2