Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2012 No. 11-51045 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff—Appellee v. EDWARDO LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-199-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The atto
Summary: Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2012 No. 11-51045 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff—Appellee v. EDWARDO LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-199-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attor..
More
Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 28, 2012
No. 11-51045
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff—Appellee
v.
EDWARDO LOPEZ,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:11-CR-199-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Edwardo Lopez has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez
has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2012
No. 11-51045
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. Lopez’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and his motion
for leave to file the letter written by his trial counsel and dated April 23, 2012,
is GRANTED.
2